<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shibboleth For AuthZ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nosheep.net/story/shibboleth-for-authz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nosheep.net/story/shibboleth-for-authz/</link>
	<description>Comic book guy, tech geek, and father of two...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:54:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Sheep &#187; CAMP Shibboleth - Wrap Up</title>
		<link>http://nosheep.net/story/shibboleth-for-authz/comment-page-1/#comment-4193</link>
		<dc:creator>No Sheep &#187; CAMP Shibboleth - Wrap Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nosheep.net/story/shibboleth-for-authz/#comment-4193</guid>
		<description>[...] 1) Plymouth State is looking at Shibboleth as a way to accomplish centralized authZ. SunGard sold me on this idea months ago when I could only see Shibb as a federated WebISO solution. I was surprised to see that they are clearly marketing this use case as step two in your implementation plan. Number one is of course to get WebSSO implemented. Both of these are suggested before attacking the politics and policy of extending beyond institutional boundaries. It is clear that this is a smaller step base method that has stages of success. I like this a lot. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1) Plymouth State is looking at Shibboleth as a way to accomplish centralized authZ. SunGard sold me on this idea months ago when I could only see Shibb as a federated WebISO solution. I was surprised to see that they are clearly marketing this use case as step two in your implementation plan. Number one is of course to get WebSSO implemented. Both of these are suggested before attacking the politics and policy of extending beyond institutional boundaries. It is clear that this is a smaller step base method that has stages of success. I like this a lot. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

