<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon Rebel XTi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nosheep.net/story/canon-rebel-xti/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nosheep.net/story/canon-rebel-xti/</link>
	<description>Comic book guy, tech geek, and father of two...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 11:01:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marney Higgs</title>
		<link>http://nosheep.net/story/canon-rebel-xti/comment-page-1/#comment-141037</link>
		<dc:creator>Marney Higgs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nosheep.net/story/canon-rebel-xti/#comment-141037</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is just my opinion, but it might have been a better choice to get the Rebel XTi and save up for better quality lenses such as a 17-40mm L and a 70-200 f/4 L. These two budget hi-end lenses would cost you near 1400 combined but are awesome. A canon prime lens like the 50mm f/1.4 or 35mm f/2.0 would be nice and cheap. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hope that camera serves you well.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just my opinion, but it might have been a better choice to get the Rebel XTi and save up for better quality lenses such as a 17-40mm L and a 70-200 f/4 L. These two budget hi-end lenses would cost you near 1400 combined but are awesome. A canon prime lens like the 50mm f/1.4 or 35mm f/2.0 would be nice and cheap. </p>
<p>I hope that camera serves you well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

